Deapthroat15

About neuroart. I will not touch on the legal side, which in my opinion will turn out to be of little importance in fact. Will neuroart and artistic neural networks cause damage to any form and type of art, from academic to naive? I am completely convinced that it is not. The tool not only does not cancel the other tool, but does not even occupy its niche. The ax does not cancel the knife. Fears about the death of artistic art have already been experienced more than once, there has already been an outbreak of emotions with the invention of photography. Why do we need artists when there is a machine that fixes the world objectively? But in the end, photography did not even replace mass portraiture. Even the transition of many portrait painters to the photo is explained rather "but what is in the guise of an ordinary bourgeois such that it would be interesting to draw?". And remember that for the first decades, photography required hours, and then tens of minutes of exposure, which was

About neuroart. I will not touch on the legal side, which in my opinion will turn out to be of little importance in fact. Will neuroart and artistic neural networks cause damage to any form and type of art, from academic to naive? I am completely convinced that it is not. The tool not only does not cancel the other tool, but does not even occupy its niche. The ax does not cancel the knife. Fears about the death of artistic art have already been experienced more than once, there has already been an outbreak of emotions with the invention of photography. Why do we need artists when there is a machine that fixes the world objectively? But in the end, photography did not even replace mass portraiture. Even the transition of many portrait painters to the photo is explained rather "but what is in the guise of an ordinary bourgeois such that it would be interesting to draw?". And remember that for the first decades, photography required hours, and then tens of minutes of exposure, which was